Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#reserved-file-and-folder-names

On 6/30/09 7:49 PM, timeless wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Marcos Caceres<marcosc@opera.com>  wrote:
>>> Or use index.html in other directories?
>> Nothing. Treated as an arbitrary file - this was already implied in
>> the spec. To make this explicitly clear, I've added:
>
> speaking of which,
>
> does<a href="foo/">foo</a>  magically map to a file?
>
> i'm assuming we're going to wait until the widget uri scheme suggests
> a handling for that.

Yes, I think so.

Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 08:34:59 UTC