RE: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject

If the extended attribute should not be ECMAScript, the description at must also be revised due
to the strong ES-reference.

What about [ValueTypeInterface]?

Regards, Steffen

-----Original Message-----
From: Maciej Stachowiak [] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:15 AM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: Cameron McCormack; Giovanni Campagna; Kruessel, Steffen; WebApps WG;
Subject: Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject

On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Marcin Hanclik wrote:

> What about [ESNativeObject]?

I don't think the property should be ES-specific. It would probably  
have effects for other language bindings too. I'm also not sure this  
clarifies the use of Native.


Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 07:51:08 UTC