Re: <access> and IRI equivalence

On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:51:02 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
> I phrased this poorly.  The question at hand is whether the spec needs a  
> dependency on HTML's use of URI references, or whether a reference to  
> the URI spec is sufficient.  I suspect that the latter is in fact the  
> case; implementations would still be free to be a bit more lenient.

Wouldn't that lead to interoperability issues?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 13:58:20 UTC