- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:51:02 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 26 Mar 2009, at 14:44, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:40:16 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> > wrote: >> 1. I think it's a good thing to phrase this in terms of the BNF from >> 3986 and 3987. I don't think it's obvious that this piece of the >> spec >> needs to reuse the HTML URI parser. > > AFAICT "that" parser is used for HTTP, CSS, HTML, XMLHttpRequest, > DOM APIs, etc. I phrased this poorly. The question at hand is whether the spec needs a dependency on HTML's use of URI references, or whether a reference to the URI spec is sufficient. I suspect that the latter is in fact the case; implementations would still be free to be a bit more lenient.
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 13:51:13 UTC