Re: Required support for SVG in widgets

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Robin Berjon <> wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 20:05 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> Yep. But like Charles said, it should be the other way around: Bondi
>> specs should be brought to the W3C for standardization once they are
>> ready. If the specs are done, implemented, and have an associated
>> test-suite, then standardization through the W3C should be a breeze,
>> right?
> The W3C doesn't do rubber-stamping. If OMTP wants to have their specs be
> Recs they will need to have them go through the process, and that means that
> changes to them are possible. Given that, if they really want W3C to
> integrate their APIs they should submit earlier than when they're ready.

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply any rubber-stamping on the part of the
W3C. In fact, I was being little sarcastic :) Anyway, we are getting
off topic.

Marcos Caceres

Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 19:53:39 UTC