- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:03:52 +0100
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Feb 4, 2009, at 20:05 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
> Yep. But like Charles said, it should be the other way around: Bondi
> specs should be brought to the W3C for standardization once they are
> ready. If the specs are done, implemented, and have an associated
> test-suite, then standardization through the W3C should be a breeze,
> right?
The W3C doesn't do rubber-stamping. If OMTP wants to have their specs
be Recs they will need to have them go through the process, and that
means that changes to them are possible. Given that, if they really
want W3C to integrate their APIs they should submit earlier than when
they're ready.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 15:04:33 UTC