- From: Krzysztof Maczyński <1981km@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:12:29 +0100
- To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: <public-webapps@w3.org>
Lachlan, Thanks for replying quickly; I'll do the same, since it probably matters much more to you, process-wise. > I have changed it to the > plural "node’s subtrees". Is that acceptable? Yes, perfectly. But this still isn't formally applicable in all cases: > The term document order means a depth-first pre-order traversal of the DOM tree or subtree in question. Would you consider "document tree" (the whole tree, of which when only some part, not necessarily forming a tree, is considered, it inherits the ordering implicitly) instead of "DOM tree or subtree in question"? > Because the use cases have no need for the method to be able to return > the element itself, and as your example shows, doing so would be > pointless and confusing. OK, use cases have their say of course. >>> definitions of the querySelector methods >> >> Is the plural intended? > > Yes, there are two definitions. One for querySelector() and another for > querySelectorAll(). Be sure I didn't miss it and had this very detail on my mind: querySelectorAll by some tacit and in my opinion undesirable assumption becomes one of "the querySelector methods". I suggest a slight change to "NodeSelector methods", referring to the name of the interface, or simply "these two methods". Best regards, Chris
Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 20:30:43 UTC