- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:02:53 +0000
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Cc: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
>>> I would like to rename "thumbnail" to "screenshot" in the packaging >>> spec. As the thumbnail "graphically represents the widget in a running >>> state" it makes more sense to call it a screenshot. >> >> I don't think so - a screenshot is generally a static image while a >> thumbnail is just a small representative image. I don't think that any >> improvement in semantics justifies changing the spec for this. > > We already have the <icon> element as the small representative image > for the widget, which is why I think screenshot is less confusing than > thumbnail. Hi Marcos, The <icon> element can be used zero-or-more times, for example: <widgets xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets"> <icon src="icons/medium.png"/> <icon src="icons/big.svg" width="256" height="256"/> <icon src="icons/tiny.png"/> </widget> Is there a way to differentiate the icons eg "mobile", "deskop", "favicon" etc ? In the above example (taken from the spec) the names suggest tiny, medium and big - how would an application know which to choose? thanks -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Received on Monday, 26 January 2009 14:03:28 UTC