- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:01:02 -0700
- To: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Sep 17, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: > > Hey Chaals, What makes you think that your pious and arrogant attitude > makes you a moderator? You have no right to dictate what I can say. The fact that Chaals is a co-Chair of the Web Applications working group makes him a moderator of this mailing list, whatever you may think of his attitude. <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/charter/> As co-Chair, it his responsibility to ensure the W3C Process is followed. The Individual Participation Criteria in the charter require, among other things, "Social competence in one's role". <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#ParticipationCriteria > Your repeated rudeness, hostility, personal attacks on Working Group members and lack of constructive contribution demonstrate a significant lack of social competence. I commend Chaals on his decision to help you stick to the Individual Participation Criteria. Should you continue to fail to do so, I hope he will take appropriate measures to keep you from disrupting the Working Group further. Regards, Maciej > > > And this: > > Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> > cc Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, > Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, > "mike@w3.org" <mike@w3.org> > > Is *not* "Private mail". Only you would know why you mailed multiple > people and called it "private". I'm putting this on the list so we can > see what kind of person "Chaals" is. > > It looks like you took it upon yourself to go out of your way to > describe me as inappropriate, accusatory, counter-productive and > attacking. You then asked me to stick to "demonstrable" facts. > > We don't really know why you did this. I pointed out the OP's > mistakes, asked him some questions, and followed with my opinion of > the relevance of YUI Test (Re Hallvord's Comments). Nobody should > discourage code reviews. Especially not for code that is supposed to > be taken seriously. > > Garrett > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> > Date: Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:33 AM > Subject: Re: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format > To: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> > Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Doug Schepers > <schepers@w3.org>, "mike@w3.org" <mike@w3.org> > > > Private mail: > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 03:56:35 +0200, Garrett Smith > <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Carmelo Montanez >> <carmelo@nist.gov> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Folks: >>> >>> I am getting ready to submit a number of tests and wanted to get >>> your >>> feedback on format. We already agreed >>> on a template a few weeks back. This follows on that format. >>> Just wanted >>> to get your view before I go forward. >>> See attached files. >>> >> You obviously did not try running this in any browser. > > Hi Garrett, > > please refrain from making assumptions about what people do. Opening a > mail with an accusatory or attacking tone of this nature is > counter-productive, and therefore inappropriate for this working > group. > > Please keep your comments to demonstrable facts and a more positive > tone in future. > > thanks > > Chaals > > -- > Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group > je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk > http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://www.opera.com >
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2008 06:01:43 UTC