- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:43:48 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: olli@pettay.fi, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Olli Pettay wrote: >> So I still propose that all the mutations to DOM are handled in a >> consistent way and that the definition of insertNode doesn't need to be >> changed. It is ACID3 which requires a small change. > > It seems far more useful to just say the mutation events always fire last, > long after any changes to the range itself. This will be consistent with > how we're redefining mutation events, and would still allow the range > insertNode() API to be useful and to perform its intended purpose. I agree we should do that if possible. That said, I still disagree with ACID3s interpretation of the spec. / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2008 08:45:30 UTC