- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:01:36 -0400
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:40:44 +0200, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > Would it be acceptable if I defined one, but made it optional for > implementers to support? Or at least optional for ECMAScript > implementations? That way an implementation can choose to support it if > feature detection is necessary for the language and there is no other > way to do it. What's the point of making the feature string optional, exactly? -Boris
Received on Monday, 14 July 2008 15:02:26 UTC