- From: Kartikaya Gupta <lists.webapps@stakface.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:45:57 +0000
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:40:44 +0200, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > > Would it be acceptable if I defined one, but made it optional for > implementers to support? Or at least optional for ECMAScript > implementations? That way an implementation can choose to support it if > feature detection is necessary for the language and there is no other > way to do it. > Yup, that's fine by me. It ensures that different implementations won't end up using different feature strings for the same feature, if they decide to go that route. Thanks, kats
Received on Monday, 14 July 2008 13:46:34 UTC