- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:52:14 +0100
- To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:26:41 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > > On 3/13/13 9:25 AM, ext Simon Pieters wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:10:55 +0100, Arthur Barstow >> <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> I see the Workers test suite has some contributions: >>> >>> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/Workers/tests/submissions/Microsoft/> >>> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/Workers/tests/submissions/Opera/> >>> >>> What is the status of these tests? Are they ready for review? Also, do >>> you consider these tests sufficient to test the spec's CR exit >>> criteria? >> >> I can't speak for the Microsoft tests, I haven't looked at them closely. >> >> The Opera tests are not all converted to testharness yet. However, I'm >> working on it right now and expect to be done tomorrow. The Opera Worker tests are now done being converted to testharness. Review welcome. >> So they will be ready for review tomorrow (hopefully). >> >> I don't know what the spec's exit criteria are > > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-workers-20120501/#crec> > >> , or what's considered sufficient. > > As this spec's Test Facilitator, would you please propose a definition > of `sufficient` for this context (exiting CR)? OK. I propose that the existing tests are sufficient. >> I can say that the Opera testsuite has a pretty good coverage, but not >> full coverage. For instance, interaction with appcache is not tested, >> transferables aren't tested, the "column" member for onerror isn't >> tested, the inheritence of interfaces isn't well tested. > > Does Opera intend to submit tests for the gaps above? If so, when? Maybe. I fixed the "column" thing as part of a test that was testing onerror. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 15:52:55 UTC