- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:46:38 -0400
- To: ext Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>
- CC: Tina Zhao <tina.zhao@intel.com>, public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org
On 8/13/13 3:56 AM, ext Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013, at 18:50, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Hi Tina, Odin, >> >> Would you please explain which part(s) of [eventsource] these two tests >> cover: >> >> 1. >> <http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/eventsource/dedicated-worker/eventsource-constructor-non-same-origin.htm> >> >> 2. >> <http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/eventsource/shared-worker/eventsource-constructor-non-same-origin.htm> >> >> -Thanks, AB >> >> [eventsource] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-eventsource-20121211/> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-eventsource-20121211/#dom-eventsource > Algorithm step 7. (the CORS part) > > It is connected to dedicated-worker and shared-worker by this language: > This constructor must be visible when the script's global object is > either a Window object or an object implementing the WorkerUtils > interface. Sorry, but would you please identify the specific part(s) of the test that asserts the sentence above? (I don't understand what "This constructor must be _visible_" means and how it is being asserted by the test.) -Thanks, AB > > Which is under the note. Shared worker and dedicated worker implement > the WorkerUtils interface. :) >
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 12:47:49 UTC