- From: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:11:37 +0000
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, ext Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- CC: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
Hey Simon any update on the Opera WebSocket tests? -Thx -----Original Message----- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 6:18 AM To: ext Simon Pieters; Kris Krueger Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org Subject: Re: Adding WebSocket and WebWorker test suites to testing framework On 11/7/12 7:45 AM, ext Simon Pieters wrote: > On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:29:18 +0100, Arthur Barstow > <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > >> On 11/6/12 12:33 PM, ext Kris Krueger wrote: >>> Simon do you actually have to convert all the tests? >>> If all the browsers pass then it would seem best to no spend time >>> converting these 'Opera' tests. >>> Since we'll delaying the spec from moving from CR -> PR waiting for >>> this work to be completed. >> >> I'd rather not wait a "few months" to start the CR interop testing. > > Then don't. > >> Can someone identify the gap(s) Opera's tests fill and just port >> those tests for now and port the others post PR? If we go that route, >> when can that (presumably) smaller porting effort be completed? > > This seems more effort than just converting all remaining tests. I > suggest we continue the work with converting the tests on the basis of > available time of those who volunteer to do the work, and take the > tests that have been converted when you want to "start testing". Thanks Simon; that sounds reasonable to me. Kris - as the TC for WebSocket, I'll assume you will start a new RfR for the additional tests when ready. -AB
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 18:13:03 UTC