- From: 유성옥 <sungok.you@infraware.co.kr>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:13:29 +0900
- To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
- Cc: 이종흔 <jhlee@infraware.co.kr>, 김성택 <stkim@infraware.co.kr>
Re-sending for archival purposes... -----Original Message----- From: 유성옥 Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 2:14 PM To: 'Arthur Barstow'; public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org Cc: 이종흔; 김성택 Subject: RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions] Hi. All We've checked all features with Web Storage. Please let me know if you have comments or we have something missing. Best Regards Sung-Ok. -----Original Message----- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 10:45 PM To: 유성옥; public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org Cc: 이종흔; 김성택 Subject: Re: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions] Thanks Sung-Ok. Sugn-OK, All - is Infraware's submission sufficiently complete such that it can be used to evaluate an implementation vis-a-vis the Web Storage Candidate Recommendation [CR]? If not, what features are not tested? -AB [CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-webstorage-20111208/#crec On 1/17/12 1:48 AM, ext 유성옥 wrote: > Hi. All > > I've updated the test case with the latest spec. > I also uploaded a test for "Content Editable". > If you have any comment about it, feel free let me know. > > Best Regards > Sung-Ok, You > > -----Original Message----- > From: 유성옥 > Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 11:34 AM > To: 'Kris Krueger'; Arthur Barstow; ext Ms2ger > Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org; 이종흔; 김성택 > Subject: RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission > [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions] > > Hi, all > This is Sung-Ok You from Infraware. > We referred to WR version when we submitted the test case.( > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-webstorage-20110208/ ) We're working on > updating it with new version of > spec.(http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-webstorage-20111208/ ) I'll update > new test case in 2 weeks. (We'll use testharness.js :)) > > Best Regards, > Sung-Ok You(Infraware) > -----Original Message----- > From: Kris Krueger [mailto:krisk@microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:54 AM > To: Arthur Barstow; ext Ms2ger; 유성옥; 이종흔; 김성택; 권우일 > Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > Subject: RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission > [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions] > > Yes they do use testharness.js > > -Kris > > -----Original Message----- > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 5:03 AM > To: ext Ms2ger; 유성옥; 이종흔; Sung Taeg Kim; Woo il Kwon > Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > Subject: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission > [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions] > > Thanks Ms2ger! > > Infraware people - what is the status of Infraware's Web Storage test suite submission? Do all of those tests use testharness.js? > > Do you consider your submission sufficiently complete such that it can be used to evaluate an implementation vis-a-vis the Web Storage Candidate Recommendation? If not, what features are not tested? > > -Thanks, Art > > On 12/27/11 6:18 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Back in July I noted a submission of test cases from Infraware. [1] >> I've now pushed the tests for appcache to the HTML test repository, >> [2] and those for Web Storage to WebApps'. [3] >> >> Ms2ger >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Jul/001 >> 2 .html [2] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/rev/d82d1d0fb1de >> [3] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/rev/5fa98635b761 >> >
Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 01:13:31 UTC