- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 07:00:43 -0400
- To: ext Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: public-webapps-testsuite <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
[ + PLH ] On 7/19/12 9:16 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote: > Hi all, > > A while back, DOM4 specified the features introduced in the Element > Traversal specification [1], and I updated the existing tests [2] to > use testharness.js [3]. > > The old tests also appear to have ended up in HG [4-5]. Does anybody > object to me removing those copies? Given this status, it does seem to make sense to remove the ET tests but I would like to hear from Philippe since I think he did some work on those tests. PLH - WDYT? If you do remove the tests, do you intend to keep the minimum directory needed to support the Status.html file [a]? Perhaps that file should explain the ET and DOM4 relationship. Another option is to remove that file too and to add the explanation to PubStatus. -Thanks, Art [a] http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ElementTraversal/tests/Status.html > > Thanks > Ms2ger > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ElementTraversal/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/ElementTraversal/tests/ > [3] http://w3c-test.org/webapps/DOMCore/tests/submissions/Ms2ger/ > [4] > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/file/7a498ac74dfc/ElementTraversal/tests > [5] http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ElementTraversal/tests/ >
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 11:01:05 UTC