- From: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:08:48 +0000
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, ext James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, "Ms2ger @ Mozilla" <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Microsoft can help - we have been evaluating some servers to make sure it can 'put arbitrary bits on the wire'. Which I think is really the current blocker for moving forward. -Kris -----Original Message----- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 5:53 AM To: ext James Graham; Kris Krueger; Ms2ger @ Mozilla Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org; Philippe Le Hégaret Subject: Re: Seeking status of the WebSocket API test suite Is someone willing to take the lead on the WebSocket API test suite? I see that Microsoft and Ms2ger have made submissions <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/>. If there are some "infrastructure" issues, what are those issues? -Thanks, AB On 12/9/11 2:48 AM, ext James Graham wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Kris Krueger wrote: > >> Everyone should be delighted that the webApps webSockets spec has >> moved to the CR stage. >> >> I believe that with a proposal sent to the list and some w3c systems >> assistance we can reach consensus on how to test webSockets. >> I'll take an action item to send a proposal to the list so that we >> can reach consensus. >> >> James please note the below post to the list - >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/1406.ht >> ml > > Ah, yes, now you point me to it I remember reading that message :) > > Has there ben any progress with the systems team? What is the nature > of the server-side component? Does it meet the requirement to be able > to put arbitary bits on the wire?
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 18:09:31 UTC