pchampin left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1161) Dear TAG, the working group has discussed further, and chosen a different path than the [PR](https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/107) linked above. The WG took the [following resolution](https://www.w3.org/2026/09/03-rdf-star-minutes#9951): > The purpose of a concrete syntax specification is to define correct language. Syntax specifications are not meant to specify how to signal or handle errors. Error signaling and handling are addressed by other specifications, including but not limited to protocol specifications. All syntax specifications are to be amended to reflect this. and implemented it in https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/115 . In order to keep the media-type future-proof, a requirement was added on future versions of N-Triples to mandate the VERSION announcement, so that consumers are not taken by surprised by new features: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/114 . -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1161#issuecomment-6057511691 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1161/6057511691@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2026 10:07:07 UTC