Re: [w3c/manifest] Add `application-context` CSS media feature (PR #1218)

kyerebo left a comment (w3c/manifest#1218)

> @kyerebo we generally do it here because we understand the context/usage better than the CSS WG - plus a lot of us who work on this are not members of the CSS WG.
> 
> However, once it stabilizes, we can certainly upstream it to the CSS WG for maintenance.
> 
> At the same time, we would get the CSS WG members to review this before merging it.

Thanks for the clarification, that makes sense to me. It'd be great to have a CSS WG member review this to avoid future friction when trying to upstream it.

> @marcoscaceres wrote:
> 
> > @benfrancis wrote:
> > > Maybe application-context should just have a boolean value?
> > > Yeah, I’m kinda landing in the same place.
> 
> Am I missing something or does the version being reviewed still have two string values rather than a boolean?

I'm also still seeing the enumerated media feature, could we have the spec text reflect the boolean media feature version (e.g. `@media (application-context)` or `@media not (application-context)`)? 



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/1218#issuecomment-4674267321
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/1218/c4674267321@github.com>