Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Express the job queue in terms of parallel queues (#1197)

mkruisselbrink left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1197)

Might be non-trivial though, since html parallel queues run the next "job" as soon as the (synchronous) steps of one job have completed, while currently the SW job queue doesn't start the next job until the previous job has explicitly signalled its completion (after possible async steps). I guess it wouldn't be too bad to have the last step of our jobs be "wait for job to be completed" (but somewhat better phrased).

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1197#issuecomment-3787672667
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1197/3787672667@github.com>