- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:30:17 -0800
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2026 02:30:21 UTC
marcoscaceres left a comment (w3c/manifest#975) @aarongustafson, > do we want to make the system flexible to allow for other color adjustments like forced-colors, inverted-colors or monochrome while we're devising it? We checked and a lot of those are computed and didn't apply in case of installation from a manifest (or could be handled in CSS itself once the app starts). Thus, we didn't see "forced-colors, inverted-colors or monochrome" becoming "a thing" that we would need to worry about in this spec with the properties that we have. @dmurph: > I would love to not pollute the root namespace of the object if that is the direction we go. e.g. we choose a name for the dictionary to be under Not sure I follow? `"overrides"` is not a thing, is it? If the object just contains other objects, then theoretically it can just be collapsed away (hence `"color_scheme_dark"` at the top-level). I guess my point being, `"overrides"` "pollutes" equally as just having `"color_scheme_dark"`. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/975#issuecomment-3775839217 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/manifest/issues/975/3775839217@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2026 02:30:21 UTC