Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Update index.bs (PR #1771)

yoshisatoyanagisawa left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1771)

Please see https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1472#issuecomment-2897117405 why it is `promise<ServiceWorkerRegistration>`.  By the way, if you think it is very logical that `update()` just fulfills its `Promise<void>` when the update is done, I want you to get consensus in the github issue I linked.  Also, I want the algorithm consistent with the IDL change.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1771#issuecomment-2897163813
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1771/c2897163813@github.com>

Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2025 08:59:23 UTC