Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Spec mostly doesn't mention blob expectations (Issue #454) from Marijn Kruisselbrink on 2025-05-02 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from May 2025)

From: Marijn Kruisselbrink <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 11:20:33 -0700
To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/454/2847828290@github.com>

mkruisselbrink left a comment (w3c/IndexedDB#454)

This is something I've been meaning to address from the FileAPI side as well (which currently more or less pretends that a Blob is an immutable bunch of bytes, and as such will always remain valid after it has been created). Without actually making things more rigorous on that side, probably specifying what the "snapshot state" of a IndexedDB backed blob is is the best you can do (similar to how it's kind of hand-wavy described for file backed blobs)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/454#issuecomment-2847828290
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/454/2847828290@github.com>

Received on Friday, 2 May 2025 18:20:37 UTC