Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Possible wrong WPT test? (Issue #442)

inexorabletash left a comment (w3c/IndexedDB#442)

Without looking in detail, your analysis seems correct. Seems like all browsers pass the test as written: https://wpt.fyi/results/IndexedDB/get-databases.any.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=IndexedDB

(Slightly sad about that `sleep_sync()`, would be better if there was a `get()` loop to keep the transaction open)

Easiest path forward is to update the spec to match reality, which would likely be to filter out databases with version 0 as suggested. Feedback about how implementations handle this would be great - if that's how they work, it gives more credence to that proposed approach.

So... more data and PRs welcome!

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/442#issuecomment-2721623478
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/442/2721623478@github.com>