- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:53:45 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2025 13:53:49 UTC
annevk left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1784) I don't think it makes sense for the abstract concept of a storage key to have an associated name to cache map. It makes a bit more sense if we're talking about instances of storage keys, but that would really be clarified by a map of its own. Perhaps > (storage key, name) -> cache or some such? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1784#issuecomment-3140066314 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1784/3140066314@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2025 13:53:49 UTC