- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 01:13:45 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 July 2025 08:13:49 UTC
@annevk commented on this pull request. > @@ -3065,6 +3065,11 @@ spec: storage; urlPrefix: https://storage.spec.whatwg.org/ :: Return |serviceWorker|'s [=service worker/script url=]. : The [=environment settings object/origin=] :: Return its registering [=/service worker client=]'s [=environment settings object/origin=]. + : The [=environment settings object/cross site ancestry=] + :: Return its registering [=/service worker client=]'s [=environment settings object/cross site ancestry=]. + <div class="note"> + Note: If service workers are not partitioned by the [=environment settings object/cross site ancestry=], clients must include logic to use the initial [=/http fetch=]'s [=/request=]'s [=request/client=]'s [=environment settings object/cross site ancestry=] when determining the "<code>SameSite</code>" mode. I'm not sure it makes a whole lot of sense to have the note? It's essentially saying you have to do something else if you don't implement the specification, which is, hmm, weird? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1775#discussion_r2230467861 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1775/review/3054531809@github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 July 2025 08:13:49 UTC