- From: Xiaocheng Hu <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:44:29 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 July 2025 07:44:33 UTC
xiaochengh left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1111) Hi @szager-chromium, the TAG discussed it and are happy with attempts to offload the main thread. We also have a few questions: 1. Should this be an early design review? 2. This proposal introduces yet another name into CSS to find the trigger element, while it can be done via selectors. Have you considered using selectors instead of names? 3. The `animation-trigger-event` functions seem rather underspecified. The exact design of the set of supported events can be critical to the success of this feature: - The `click()` in the example suggests that we can use those defined in [UI Events](https://w3c.github.io/uievents/) as trigger events, so that the main thread can be offloaded. However, not all UI events make sense here (e.g. `unload`), and some must involve the main thread (e.g. `input`) - This adds a strong dependency between CSS Animations and UI Events specs, which might be a heavy maintenance workload in the future. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1111#issuecomment-3116764713 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1111/3116764713@github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 July 2025 07:44:33 UTC