Re: [whatwg/webidl] Update all examples, and the lt for the type, to the new underscore'd token (PR #1500)

@annevk commented on this pull request.



> +      async_iterable<value_type>;
+      async_iterable<value_type>(/* arguments... */);
+      async_iterable<key_type, value_type>;
+      async_iterable<key_type, value_type>(/* arguments... */);

Can you explain why the same name here results in a problem for the grammar? Don't we have other concepts that share the name in this way?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1500#discussion_r2203925519
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1500/review/3014883882@github.com>