- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 22:50:28 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/61/3051213049@github.com>
domenic left a comment (whatwg/dom#61) I've looked at the code for this recently as it impacts speculation rules (https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/11426). In Chromium, document base URL changes have [the following impacts](https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/renderer/core/dom/document.cc;l=4792-4839;drc=17252ebab8c8f8977b19616706fa98dcf4d9d7ae): - Clearing the `fill_or_clip_path_uri_value_cache_` in the style engine. - Invalidating `:visited` - Clearing the cache we use to resolve relative URLs - Re-parsing `<script type=speculationrules>` - Re-triggering speculation rules So I think we can basically remove the current concept, and then add back something more rigorous for speculation rules. Although `:visited` is directly observable, it's specified in a very hand-wavey way ([HTML](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/semantics-other.html#selector-visited), [CSS](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#visited-pseudo); basically "has this link been visited") which does not need an explicit hook in the spec to update it. I'll post a PR for this. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/61#issuecomment-3051213049 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/61/3051213049@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2025 05:50:32 UTC