- From: Mustaq Ahmed <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 08:32:49 -0800
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2025 16:32:53 UTC
mustaqahmed left a comment (w3c/pointerlock#104) Thanks for filing this issue! Before we look into this, I would suggest a simplified view of the problem here because PointerLock affects only _mouse_ pointers by definition, and that in practice no system exposes a non-primary mouse pointer (see the last "note" in [Section 4.1.2](https://w3c.github.io/pointerevents/#the-primary-pointer)). So I would suggest dropping the `pointerId` condition here and adding a line in the spec to emphasize that PointerLock is only about _primary_ mouse pointers. What do you think? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/104#issuecomment-3642757110 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/issues/104/3642757110@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2025 16:32:53 UTC