- From: Masayuki Nakano <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 21:36:53 -0800
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2025 05:36:57 UTC
masayuki-nakano created an issue (w3c/pointerlock#104) It's defined as having non-zero values for `pointermove` and I suggested that they should be available with `pointerrawupdate` too. * https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/100 * https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/535 However, the Pointer Lock 2.0 spec does not mention about `pointerId`. I think that the values should be difference from the corresponding event whose `pointerId` is the same as the event. E.g., when there are 2 pointers, 1. `pointermove` for `pointerId: 1` 2. `pointermove` for `pointerId: 2` (should be zero) 3. `pointerrawupdate` for `pointerId: 1` (should be diff from the first `pointermove`) 4. `pointerrawupdate` for `pointerId: 1` (should be diff from the previous `pointerrawupdate`) 5. `pointermove` for `pointerId: 1` (should be diff from the first `pointermove`) 6. `pointerrawupdate` for `pointerId: 2` (should be diff from the second `pointermove`) 7. `pointerrawupdate` for `pointerId: 2` (should be diff from the previous `pointerawupdate`) 8. `pointermove` for `pointerId: 2` (should be diff from the second `pointermove`) ccing: @smaug---- @mustaqahmed @daxpedda -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/104 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/issues/104@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2025 05:36:57 UTC