- From: Alice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 01:44:41 -0700
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 18 August 2025 08:44:46 UTC
@alice commented on this pull request. > +> However, the underlying association still exists even if the IDL getter returns null: +> the input would be connected to the form, for example; it's just not reflected by the `.form` attribute. This sentence is potentially confusing: I mean to convey that even if the IDL attribute's type isn't compatible, the association is still valid. I'm not sure whether it's better to just remove this sentence, or to re-word it somehow to be less confusing. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/pull/1109#pullrequestreview-3127385881 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/pull/1109/review/3127385881@github.com>
Received on Monday, 18 August 2025 08:44:46 UTC