matatk left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1111) Hi @szager-chromium; thanks for your updates and answers to our questions. We discussed Declarative Interactions again this week, and I think we will be discussing the proposal again soon. Regarding the naming/indirection (question 2): Acknowledged that the convention adopted is idiomatic for CSS. That being said, it would be helpful for me and other reviewers if you could clarify the specific reason(s) that you were warned against using the selectors approach. Please could you add that info to the explainer? The reason for asking is that having the knowledge of other approaches that were tried—and why they were discounted—is really helpful for readers and reviewers of a proposal to understand the trade-offs made during its design. This is especially the case if the reader isn't an expert in the domain of a given proposal. Thanks again for your updates so far, and in advance for any clarification on question 2 that you may be able to add. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1111#issuecomment-3169248554 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1111/3169248554@github.com>
Received on Friday, 8 August 2025 20:48:56 UTC