- From: Yoshisato Yanagisawa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:42:07 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2025 01:42:11 UTC
yoshisatoyanagisawa left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1515) FYI but https://issues.chromium.org/issues/41337436 has been fixed, and now Chromium follows the spec. With this world, you might need to have a mapping of a client ID and current URL (including a hash fragment). I did not come up with a way with linear logic flow. I also think `client.currentURL` can be a choice, but I would like to know other attendees opinions. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1515#issuecomment-2840599695 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1515/2840599695@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2025 01:42:11 UTC