- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:25:59 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 11 April 2025 19:26:03 UTC
inexorabletash left a comment (w3c/IndexedDB#446) It's an unfortunate limitation that keys can't be defined using Web IDL. If it could, then by _not_ specifying `[AllowResizable]` (and maybe `[AllowShared]`) this would not be an issue. So another approach would be to include a call to `IsResizableArrayBuffer()`, either here or in Web IDL (as we did for [detached](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#buffersource-detached)) Or should we push a test into [get a copy of the bytes held by the buffer source](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#dfn-get-buffer-source-copy) itself? @domenic - any thoughts? Aside: Somehow the spec ended up with `[[=BufferSource/detached=]]` - an extra set of `[]`. We should fix that too. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/446#issuecomment-2797847840 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/446/2797847840@github.com>
Received on Friday, 11 April 2025 19:26:03 UTC