Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request destination for SVG documents (#1012)

From a theoretical stand point, I guess it would make sense to have a new destination type? The "cloning" behavior with `<use>` is not easily covered by something like "iframe" and should get their own type for the most appropriate handling.

I am OK with treating image-related uses of SVG as `image`. But that all being said, some of these things seem unfortunately codified in the web platforms by e.g., the de-facto handling of `svg` like `image` in some parts of Chrome (at least CSP. We have not looked more closely)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1012#issuecomment-2379346985
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/1012/2379346985@github.com>