Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review for CR transition of WebAssembly specifications for version 2.0 features (Issue #1002)

Unfortunately there isn't such a convenient document. Reference types is actually especially bad in this respect (i.e. listing the design considerations in isolation) because it was carved out of the GC proposal as a prerequisite. The explainer for [GC](https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc/blob/main/proposals/gc/Overview.md) has more background (and details in the GC [MVP](https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc/blob/main/proposals/gc/MVP.md); the rationale was basically to pull out a very minimal subset (the concept of a reference type, as well as the `externref` type and the allowance for multiple tables) to go through the process first.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1002#issuecomment-2433377952
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1002/2433377952@github.com>