Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review for CR transition of WebAssembly specifications for version 2.0 features (Issue #1002)

Thanks for pointing to the GC docs, those definitely help.

Personally, I find the need to document things like user benefit as less acute for WASM.  It was worth asking though.  It's a bit of a shame that the documentation created during the development of features is ultimately lost.  Having a well-maintained set of that sort of documentation *is* expensive, so it's understandable how things end up in this state.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1002#issuecomment-2433755175
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1002/2433755175@github.com>