Re: [WICG/webcomponents] Reference Target naming (Issue #1087)

> hm... how about idForwarding or idTarget?

Feels like anything specifically revolving around “id” flies in the face of W3C TAG wanting to find a path away from needing to rely on IDs to reference things across the DOM. 🤷🏼‍♂️

As a component author, I’ve no problems with `referenceTarget`, particularly in that I don’t need to read from it almost ever and expect to write to it only slightly more frequently. Naming only feels like it would be of issue here if (when?) the suggestion away from a micro DSL for maps in Level 2 is enforced.

Not to make a specific vote for it, but if a rename is required… in a world where `commandFor` is becoming a thing would expanding on “for” in some way be appropriate? e.g. `delegatesFor` or `targetFor`…

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1087#issuecomment-2505207117
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1087/2505207117@github.com>