- From: Matt Giuca <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 00:37:09 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2024 07:37:13 UTC
@mgiuca commented on this pull request. > + for a matching application. However, since old versions of this spec + (and, possibly, old user agents) did not remove the [=URL/fragment=] + from the [=URL=] at parse time, and relied only on + [=URL/equals/exclude fragments|excluding fragments=] during + comparisons, there may be historical app data with [=URL/fragments=] + in the <code>[=manifest/id=]</code>. Therefore, it is best practice for user + agents to [=URL/equals/exclude fragments=] even when comparing two + [=URLs=] that should not have any fragments. Thanks, good catch! I rephrased these a bit but got rid of the RFC words. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/1122#discussion_r1609449170 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/1122/review/2070378048@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2024 07:37:13 UTC