Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Protected Audience (Issue #723)

just came back to this from a different thread (an I2S for a related control) and I'm deeply concerned with the tone and content of @plinss's last comment here. We do not come to the TAG for a go/no-go decision, we ask the TAG for constructive technical feedback and platform consistency guidance. It's fine to say "this is all wrong", but my expectation of TAG feedback is that these sorts of replies are constructed about why features are _technically_ wrong. The last message is heavy on atmospherics and judgement and contains no new technical content. What's going on here?

I'm dismayed that the TAG appears confused about how it can best be of service to the project of improving the platform.

/cc @chrishtr 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/723#issuecomment-2100898391
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/723/2100898391@github.com>