Re: [w3c/permissions] describe implicitly-granted (chooser-based) permissions (#178)

**Summary of Issue #178** (Thanks ChatGPT)

**Context:**  
This issue questions whether the Permissions specification needs additional clarity or changes to ensure user agents’ behavior is well-defined, without becoming overly prescriptive.

**Key Points:**

1. **Clarity vs. Over-Specification:**  
   The discussion focuses on providing sufficient guidance to user agents without constraining their flexibility unnecessarily.

2. **Current Consensus:**  
   Although some clarifications might be beneficial, there is no strong inclination toward making normative, mandatory changes. The conversation centers on potential editorial improvements rather than fundamental adjustments.

3. **Impact on CR Transition:**  
   There’s no indication that this issue poses a significant blocker to moving the Permissions specification to Candidate Recommendation (CR). It’s seen more as an opportunity for refinement rather than a showstopper.

**Conclusion:**  
No major spec changes are required, and this issue is unlikely to delay the CR transition. Any resulting actions would likely be minor editorial clarifications.


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/178#issuecomment-2555856287
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/permissions/issues/178/2555856287@github.com>