Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Soft Navigations (Issue #879)

Hi @yoavweiss,

We looked at this again today during a breakout and had some questions. 
If the heuristics are still being worked on, is the purpose of this review to review the rest of the API, assuming the heuristics are good?
Are the heuristics meant to be normative? Will there be ways for the developers to tweak this in either direction (both opt out of a detected soft navigation as well as be able to declare something as a soft navigation that was not caught by the heuristics).
We also wondered about multi-stakeholder interest. https://chromestatus.com/feature/5144837209194496 lists "No signal" for both Firefox and Safari. Have standards positions been requested? If so, including the links to these would be useful (we plan to make this part of our explainer template very soon).

Thank you!

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/879#issuecomment-1734122375
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/879/1734122375@github.com>