Re: [w3c/editing] RFC: Contenteditable "indent"/"outdent" implementations are not aligned with popular editors (Issue #437)

@zcorpan: Sounds good. Sorry, I answered by email and didn't know the user
tag would go through.

That list looks relatively complete. Some editors are there multiple times
as some are frameworks that other editors are based on (fx Tiptap is using
the Prosemirror framework).

Missing are editors for specific web systems (fx Gutenberg for Wordpress)
and special usage editors like CodeMirror or MathLive that also may contain
some contenteditable.

I can try to compile a more complete list next week some time.

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, 16:19 Simon Pieters ***@***.***> wrote:

> @johanneswilm <https://github.com/johanneswilm>
>
> What will thr research exactly entail? Will you check whether changing the
> browser engine will break popular JavaScript editors? That would be the
> main problem if any of this code is changed.
>
> Yes.
>
> Is there a good list of editors I should check? I've found
> https://github.com/JefMari/awesome-wysiwyg-editors but maybe it's missing
> some important editors.
>
> (BTW, my alias is @zcorpan <https://github.com/zcorpan>, @simon is
> someone else.)
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/437#issuecomment-1729681620>, or
> unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAERMOB4FYO2L73QOZ5IJH3X3REI7ANCNFSM6AAAAAA4HOREMU>
> .
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/437#issuecomment-1729730549
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/editing/issues/437/1729730549@github.com>