Re: [w3c/editing] RFC: Contenteditable "indent"/"outdent" implementations are not aligned with popular editors (Issue #437)

Hey, yes so to be clear: Simon will investigate some.And then that might
end up in sone spec text and a bug report for various browsers. But then
there is no guarantee that the bug report will be acted upon.
Contenteditable bug reports can at times sit around for 15+ years without
anything happening as it's mostly a legacy feature.

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, 14:40 joanmarie ***@***.***> wrote:

> Hey, could you make separate issues for each of those points?
>
> Done. I was erring on the side of caution (Does this working group really
> want a bunch of issues all for a feature that authors seem to be
> discouraged from using?). But now that I know this is your preference, I
> will do so going forward. I'll try not to file too many more. 😉
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/437#issuecomment-1729488349>, or
> unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAERMOC6FLRN2LS4XSYX53LX3QYVJANCNFSM6AAAAAA4HOREMU>
> .
> You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/437#issuecomment-1729514127
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/editing/issues/437/1729514127@github.com>