- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:34:09 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 15 September 2023 20:34:15 UTC
Thanks for the link to https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/388, I've commented there. > The middle case would solve for Firefox's compat issues, and Chrome's "one time grant" experiment, right? No, the middle case describes status quo. What Firefox [intends to ship](https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-platform/c/auH04v5gGk8/m/uADZ4u-MCAAJ?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#:~:text=Since%20Firefox%20grants,hence%20this%20design.) is: "ephemeral grant (via 'grant this time' UI or UA policy) => "granted" until the user denies a future prompt or revokes I.e. one-time permission as the norm. The Firefox permission prompt is mostly harmless: if a user denies a prompt, the site gets `"blocked"` for the duration of that document only, then `"prompt"` after that. ↻ → 👍 We therefore don't think apps need a guarantee of a prompt-free experience in Firefox (with the fingerprinting side-effects @npdoty mentions), but if you do, I suggest supporting this issue. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/414#issuecomment-1721836644 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/permissions/issues/414/1721836644@github.com>
Received on Friday, 15 September 2023 20:34:15 UTC