- From: Justin Fagnani <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:55:36 -0700
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 15 September 2023 16:55:41 UTC
If bookkeeping does end up being irreducibly expensive, I was definitely partial to the `template.cloneWithParts()` API before, which essentially required any bookkeeping to be done on the JS side. If you don't have uncontrolled DOM mutations, where you then have to ask for the current parts, this seems fine. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1030#issuecomment-1721579842 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1030/1721579842@github.com>
Received on Friday, 15 September 2023 16:55:41 UTC