- From: iteriani <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 06:25:57 -0700
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 15 September 2023 13:26:04 UTC
We’re going to look into seeing if we’re doing anything egregious. I guess if we’re using ChildNodePart.replaceChildren with a document fragment, the operation to update parts should be pretty cheap. I was thinking with a normal dom element, you’d have to track its owner part and move the related parts accordingly, but we’re not exactly doing that. On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:49 PM Ryosuke Niwa ***@***.***> wrote: > Why is supporting getParts() to be updated so expensive? It seems like an > implementation problem to me. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1030#issuecomment-1721068942>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2MCG4HSHW2E25UIAWDYWDX2QXEHANCNFSM6AAAAAA4ZR4NWQ> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> > -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1030#issuecomment-1721280308 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1030/1721280308@github.com>
Received on Friday, 15 September 2023 13:26:04 UTC