Re: [WICG/webcomponents] Alternative to customized built-in - Element custom enhancements (Issue #1000)

Some feedback from the meeting, which I hope to address (assuming this proposal isn't dead in the water):

1.  Preference for sticking with the same names as custom elements as far as lifecycle events.  (I don't care too much about names.  I used attached vs connected, because I thought connected had a special meaning related to being connected to the live DOM tree, and I think it's important for the enhancements to be able to be active prior to being to added to the live DOM tree, during template instantiation.  If I'm wrong about the special meaning of "connected", or about the utility of becoming active prior to being added to the live DOM tree, it makes sense to make the names match.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1000#issuecomment-1717717950
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1000/1717717950@github.com>